Out-of 14 questions off cervical cancer tests, female whoever get was basically ? ten was randomly categorized because that have ‘good knowledge’ otherwise were regarded as having “unhealthy studies”. Getting experience with HPV, female whoever address is ‘never ever observed HPV’ have been omitted from the investigation from HPV training.
From 5 issues, female whose rating have been ? step three were thought to be which have ‘a expertise in HPV’ usually given that ‘not-good knowledge’. Regarding 19 issues, feminine whose rating were ? 13 had been categorized since the with ‘a good full knowledge’ if not as ‘not good full knowledge’.
All of the data was obtained in the a digital databases and you can reviewed using SPSS V.26.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Descriptive analytics were used to research demographic analysis and you can was in fact summarized given that number having percentage, imply having standard departure otherwise median that have variety. Brand new organization ranging from for each and every changeable and training get was indeed assessed having fun with effortless linear regression. Exploratory model was made in the multivariable investigation as well as most of the parameters possibly regarding the knowledge rating. Brand new hvordan man mГёder Georgien-kvinder thought quantity of mathematical relevance was an effective p-property value 0.05 or reduced.
Away from five-hundred ladies who came across introduction conditions and was indeed invited towards the studies, you to ong 499 women who responded to new questionnaire from the studies out of cervical disease and screening (area II) and information about HPV (part II), a few failed to give personal information. Thus group study had been in just 497 feminine (Desk 1). The fresh suggest period of 497 professionals try many years (SD ± ). More than half of your own professionals was in fact old Desk step 1. Socio-economic characteristic (N = 497).
Brand new evidence having colposcopy was basically irregular cervical cytology with visibility out-of HR-HPV (155; 30.2%), irregular cytology having negative or unfamiliar of Hours-Horsepower (274; 55.1%), exposure regarding just Hours-HPV (65; 13.1%), otherwise simply reputation for CIN (3; 0.6%) (Dining table dos).
Predicated on for each and every matter throughout the cervical malignant tumors assessment (Desk 3), 95.4% away from 499 women misinterpreted that most women is going to be processed for cervical cancers (Q step one). Everything 55% to help you 70% knew when to begin and you may frequency of assessment (Q 2–4). not, merely 17.4% and you can thirty six.3%have been conscious that the fresh tests wasn’t needed subsequent–immediately following hysterectomy to possess non-cervical cancers (Q 5) otherwise after 65 many years that have history of repeatedly typical previous evaluation (Q six).
For the methods of assessment (Q 7–14), 79% from members was indeed aware that there had been of many evaluation strategies (Q eight). Although not, merely eight.2% had studies you to cervical testing might be done during the time out-of pelvic test (Q 8). The players was in fact familiar with cervical cytologic testing (Q 10; 93.8%), HPV review (Q eleven; 89.2%), co-review (Q 12; ninety five.4%) although not with graphic inspection once acetic acidic (VIA) which had been identified in just 30.7% (Q 9). Additionally, 57.7% and 65.3% off players got misconception you to cervical cancers evaluating would be done by imaging (Q 13) and you may bloodstream sample to possess cyst markers (Q fourteen), correspondingly.
For knowledge of HPV, 110 users (20.0%) had never observed HPV. One of several remaining 389 users, bulk (92.5%) understood you to HPV infection was avoidable and you will 85.1% had been aware that it’s avoidable by vaccination. Even when most (ninety.5%) realized one cervical cancer tumors comes from oncogenic HPV, only about half understood it can easily be avoided by avoiding sexual interest otherwise venereal wart is due to non-oncogenic HPV.
We examined knowledge of the participants by score (Table 4). The new imply millions of users to have expertise in cervical cancer assessment (Letter = 499) as well as HPV (N = 389) had been ± 2.37 (regarding fourteen issues) and you may step three.53 ± step 1.11 (out-of 5 inquiries), respectively. From the categorization, twenty six.9% and you can 20.1% had a great knowledge of cervical disease tests and HPV correspondingly. This new imply contribution rating of real information about cervical cancer tumors screening and you will HPV was ± 2.87 (of 19 issues), in just twenty-five.2% got an excellent total studies.